Glossary

Move the mouse pointer over a red word in the main text, to view the glossary entry for this word.

Admission and Treatment in the Prisoner Infirmary

 a  “[T]he destructive conditions in the camp, the poor hygienic and sanitary conditions, excessive work, starvation rations, inadequate clothing that gave no protection against damp and cold, as well as—no less important—life under perpetual nervous tension, constant terror, quickly led to the deterioration of the prisoners’ state of health and lowered their resistance. [...] The means for treatment were far from adequate, too.”

(Antoni Makowski: “Organisation, Entwicklung und Tätigkeit des Häftlings-Krankenbaus in Monowitz (KL Auschwitz III).” In: Hefte von Auschwitz 15 (1975), pp. 113–181, here p. 135. (Transl. KL))
 
 b  “Especially dreaded by the inmates was the dysentery [diarrhea] ward. After admission to this ward the inmate was automatically made to go hungry for 2 days, for reasons of diet. The mortality was here extraordinarily high.”
(Berthold Epstein, affidavit, March 3, 1947, NI-5847. Archive of the Fritz Bauer Institute, Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, Case VI, PDB 75 (e), pp. 168–170, here p. 168.)
 
 c  “These are checked every third day. They are placed in a line along the corridor. At the end there are two tin-plate pots, and the nurse with a register, watch and pencil. Two at a time, the patients present themselves and have to show, on the spot and at once, that they still have diarrhea; to prove it, they are given exactly one minute. After which, they show the result to the nurse, who looks at it and judges. They wash the pots quickly in a wash-tub near by and the next two take over. Of those waiting, some are contorted in the pain of keeping in their precious evidence another ten, another twenty minutes; others, without resources at the moment, strain veins and muscles in a contrary effort. The nurse watches, impassive, chewing his pencil, one eye on the watch, one eye on the specimens gradually presented him. In doubtful cases, he leaves with the pot to show it to the doctor.”
(Primo Levi: Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996) [first published as If This Is a Man], p. 54.)

“In every hospital an effort is made to make sick people well again. The hospital of the IG camp Monowitz had merely the task of repairing tools.”[1]

 

The outpatient clinic of the prisoner infirmary (HKB; Häftlingskrankenbau), established in the Buna/Monowitz concentration camp in 1942, was in operation in the evening, after work ended. After evening roll call, inmates who were sick or injured could join the long line of those waiting to be admitted. The prisoners stood outdoors in any wind and weather—there was no waiting room. Anyone who was declared an Arztvormelder (a patient presenting a medical concern) by the clinic’s male nurses in the evening had to show up again the next morning, right after reveille, to be definitively accepted or rejected after superficial examination by a doctor. Rejection meant “block rest,” that is, the prisoners were sent back to their barracks and were not required to march out to work that day. Rest was not guaranteed them, however; often they were called upon to do work inside the camp.

 

Admission to the HKB meant a shower, a shave, and assignment to the appropriate ward of the infirmary. Intake was done with the prisoner barefooted and naked, and his bowl and spoon, like all other possessions, had to be handed over. The orderlies could earn extra income by selling these items. After admission, the patients received a shirt and trousers from the HKB’s stocks. The guidelines for admission to the HKB were determined jointly by the SS and I.G. Farben; generally, only those “whose recovery does not take more than 2 weeks”[2] were supposed to be admitted to the hospital. Most patients received only outpatient treatment within the scope of the extremely limited potential.  a  Still, former inmate physician Antoni Makowski speaks of medications that were compounded in the HKB’s lab by prisoner pharmacists, and even of eyeglasses that could be fitted. There is reason to assume, however, that most prisoners could not take advantage of these offerings: it was primarily the privileged inmates who were better provided for. “Rare drugs were available to high-ranking prisoner functionaries even when a ‘normal’ prisoner could no longer get even a simple painkiller,”[3] as historian Bernd Wagner emphasizes. A few prisoners with good connections were protected in some cases by orderlies or prisoner physicians and frequently were saved several times from death in the gas chamber.

 

Infirmary admission and the granting of a few days of rest was a difficult proposition by itself. Once prisoners overcame these obstacles, the hospital stay was not devoid of risk: For one thing, the SS conducted selections there when the percentage of patients was too high. For another, prisoners with diarrhea, for example, might be admitted, but not many survived the treatment, which consisted of one or two days of fasting.  b 

 

The prisoner physician Dr. Stefan Budziaszek (Buthner) frequently performed abdominal surgery and hernia repairs, after he had helped set up and equip an operating room. Budziaszek also conducted “show operations” in front of SS doctors.

 

Skin diseases and ulcerous inflammations usually were treated with simple ointments, which often had no effect. Highly contagious diseases usually led to selection and murder of those afflicted. The diseases endemic to the Buna/Monowitz concentration camp resulted from malnutrition, leading for example to edema and diarrhea, and from impaired resistance and inadequate clothing, leading to coughs and sneezes of all kinds and infectious diseases like diphtheria, typhus, or scarlet fever. Some diseases required surgical treatment. Also common were injuries due to inadequate protective gear at the construction site, exhaustion, or corporal punishment. In addition, the prisoner physician Dr. Robert Waitz observed various diseases appearing in epidemic form, depending on the season: In summer, many suffered from diarrhea  c , while in spring and in cold weather there was an increased incidence of pneumonia, edema, festering inflammations, and erysipelas. Moreover, the camp was stricken with a scabies epidemic in the latter half of 1944.

 

Often it was the orderlies, the male nurses, who were responsible for treatment; the senior physician made his morning rounds, assisted by one or two orderlies. The patients had to make their way to him; he did not come to the bed. In the evening, there was another brief check-up round. In between, the meal, the camp soup, was distributed in three shifts. Once a patient was halfway restored, he was released, often prematurely, and sent back to work in his still-weakened state. Generally he was put in a new block, and the first thing he had to do was scrimp and save his rations again to buy another spoon.

(SP; transl. KL)



Sources

Berthold Epstein, affidavit, March 3, 1947, NI-5847. Archive of the Fritz Bauer Institute, Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, Case VI, PDB 75 (e), pp. 168–170.

Leon Staischak [Stasiak], affidavit, September 3, 1947, NI-10928. Archive of the Fritz Bauer Institute, Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, Case VI, PDB 75 (e), pp. 181–186.

Noack Treister, affidavit, March 3, 1947, NI-4827. Archive of the Fritz Bauer Institute, Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, Case VI, PDB 75 (e), pp. 160–162, and PDB 79 (e), pp. 1–3.

Robert Waitz, affidavit, November 12, 1947, NI-12373. Archive of the Fritz Bauer Institute, Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, Case VI, PDB 75 (e), addendum, 213, 17 pp.

 

Literature

Levi, Primo: Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996 [first published as If This Is a Man].

Levi, Primo / de Benedetti, Leonardo: “Report on the Sanitary and Medical Organization of the Monowitz Concentration Camp for Jews (Auschwitz—Upper Silesia).” In: Primo Levi: Auschwitz Report. London/New York: Verso, 2006, pp. 31–78.

Makowski, Antoni: “Organisation, Entwicklung und Tätigkeit des Häftlings-Krankenbaus in Monowitz (KL Auschwitz III).” In: Hefte von Auschwitz 15 (1975), pp. 113–181.

Wagner, Bernd C.: IG Auschwitz. Zwangsarbeit und Vernichtung von Häftlingen des Lagers Monowitz 1941–1945. Munich: Saur, 2000.

White, Joseph Robert: “IG Auschwitz: The Primacy of Racial Politics.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, NE, 2000.

[1] Leon Staischak [Stasiak], affidavit, September 3, 1947, NI-10928. Archive of the Fritz Bauer Institute, Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, Case VI, PDB 75 (e), pp. 181–186, here p. 183.

[2] Berthold Epstein, affidavit, March 3, 1947, NI-5847. Archive of the Fritz Bauer Institute, Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, Case VI, PDB 75 (e), pp. 168–170, here p. 168.

[3] Bernd C. Wagner: IG Auschwitz. Zwangsarbeit und Vernichtung von Häftlingen des Lagers Monowitz 1941–1945 (Munich: Saur, 2000), p. 172. (Translated by KL)